Man did this set me
off this morning. Talk about
stereotyping and being judgmental and showing partiality! I'm going to take this a section at a time.
James 2:1-10(NKJV)
1My brethren, do not hold the faith of our
Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of
glory, with partiality.
2For if there should come into your assembly a man with gold rings, in
fine apparel, and there should also come in a poor man in filthy clothes,
3and you pay attention to the one
wearing the fine clothes and say to him, “You sit here in a good place,” and
say to the poor man, “You stand there,” or, “Sit here at my footstool,”
4have you not shown partiality
among yourselves, and become judges with evil thoughts?
So we have James
here condemning this. Now I'm not saying
we should be judgmental against the poor but what I am saying is that there is
a reason that there is a saying about first impressions and why they are so important. The author thinks that this is indicative of
evil intent. I see it more as normal
human behavior.
But didn't Jesus himself use a similar example about the wedding feast? About sitting in places of honor etc.? And when Jesus had the opportunity, He
didn't condemn the practice. He seemed
to think it was quite normal. Jesus'
warning was to sit in an unpretentious place and let the host elevate you
to a place of honor vs assuming that
honor for yourself.
In addition, Jesus
has told us that there is clearly partiality shown in Heaven. There will be places of honor and places of
not as much honor. I think it was the
mother of James and John who asked Jesus if her sons could sit at the left hand
of God and Jesus clearly told her that was an honor that he couldn't give.
Now let's look at a
different issue. In the Old Testament we
are warned not to show partiality in certain situations. Situations that involve justice. From a fairness or justice standpoint we are
told that there should be no partiality shown to the rich or poor. And yet here in James, the author is clearly
showing partiality to the poor at the expense of the rich. The way he views the rich and the poor is so
stereotypical.
5Listen, my beloved brethren: Has
God not chosen the poor of this world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom which He
promised to those who love Him?
6But you have dishonored the poor
man. Do not the rich oppress you and drag you into the courts?
7Do they not blaspheme that noble
name by which you are called?
Talk about
stereotypes. Let's look at the first
question. "Has God not chosen the
poor of this world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom which He
promised to those who love Him?"
Does that mean all
poor people are automatically saved regardless of whether they believe in God
or not, just because they are poor? Lets
face it, we can go to any city in America and probably anywhere in the world for
that matter and find poor people who have no belief in God and are not living
Godly lives. Is God really going to give
them treatment that is equal with what He gives "those who love Him"? We serve a just God. Does that seem just to you?
So while portraying
all poor as virtuous he goes on to paint all rich as evil. Does that seem like real life to you? There are many examples in the Bible where
God rewards or promises to reward with wealth and prosperity. Would it be James contention that God is
rewarding those who please Him with evil gifts?
8If you really fulfill the royal law according to the
Scripture, “You shall love your neighbor
as yourself,” £ you do
well;
9but if you show partiality, you commit sin, and are convicted by
the law as transgressors.
10For whoever shall keep the whole law, and
yet stumble in one point, he is
guilty of all.
And isn't that what
James does in these verses? He shows
extreme partiality and I believe the real sin here is that it give some people
verses from the Bible to paint all poor people as virtuous and all rich people as
evil, promoting the very partiality that the Bible says perverts justice.