This just seems to
be one of those human conditions that is hard to tame. I happen to be of the opinion that many in
the clergy today are simply modern day Pharisees. By that I mean that they like to add their
own twists that really aren't in Scripture.
It is just their interpretation.
Unfortunately that
is an impulse that goes all the way back to the disciples. Read through this story and I'll explain what
I mean.
Acts 15:1-21(NKJV)
And certain men came down from Judea and taught the
brethren, “Unless you are
circumcised according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved.”
Therefore, when Paul
and Barnabas had no small dissension and dispute with them, they determined
that Paul and Barnabas and certain others of them should go up to Jerusalem, to
the apostles and elders, about this question.
So, being sent on
their way by the church, they passed through Phoenicia and Samaria, describing
the conversion of the Gentiles; and they caused great joy to all the
brethren.
And when they had
come to Jerusalem, they were received by the church and the apostles and the
elders; and they reported all things that God had done with them.
But some of the sect of the
Pharisees who believed rose up, saying, “It is necessary to circumcise them,
and to command them to keep the law of Moses.”
Now the apostles and
elders came together to consider this matter.
And when there had been much
dispute, Peter rose up and said to them: “Men and brethren, you know that a
good while ago God chose among us, that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear
the word of the gospel and believe.
So God, who knows the heart,
acknowledged them by giving them the Holy Spirit, just as He did to us,
and made no distinction between
us and them, purifying their hearts by faith.
Now therefore, why do you test
God by putting a yoke on the neck of the disciples which neither our fathers
nor we were able to bear?
But we believe that through the
grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved in the same manner as
they.”
Then all the
multitude kept silent and listened to Barnabas and Paul declaring how many
miracles and wonders God had worked through them among the Gentiles.
And after they had become
silent, James answered, saying, “Men and brethren, listen to me:
Simon has declared how God at
the first visited the Gentiles to take out of them a people for His name.
And with this the words of the
prophets agree, just as it is written:
‘After this I will
return And will rebuild the tabernacle of David, which
has fallen down; I will rebuild its ruins,
And I will set it up;
So
that the rest of mankind may seek the Lord, Even
all the Gentiles who are called by My name, Says the Lord who does
all these things.’
“Known to God from eternity are
all His works.
Therefore I judge
that we should not trouble those from among the Gentiles who are turning to
God,
(So far so
good. But then look where James goes
next. )
but that we write to
them to abstain from things polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from
things strangled, and from
blood.
For Moses has had
throughout many generations those who preach him in every city, being read in
the synagogues every Sabbath.”
Here is what I am
getting at. Why is it that James felt
that they had to respond by giving them some other do's and don'ts instead of
simply following God's example and calling it good if they believed in their
heart? And why did he go back to the Old
Testament for his reference point?
Now let me be clear that I don't think that the things they warned about are
bad to warn about but I don't think this was the proper venue to do that. The questions was simple. Should we add on other things (in this case
circumcision) to the Gentile's requirements for being saved. I believe that God was pretty clear by giving
them the Holy Spirit that they had already done all that God felt they needed
to do.
Unfortunately the
Disciples couldn't refrain from substituting their judgement for God's.